Labels

accent adbusters advertisement aimee chan 陳茵媺 air conditioner al gore alien animal apple armani art art student owl association attraction barbara kruger bbpp beauty blogging brand britain browser bruce lee business campaign cantonese 廣東話 celebration cello chanel chewing gum chinese christmas civilisation comforting words computer concept consumption copyright copywriting cosmetics creation death democracy design diamond diary disney drawing dream drink drug e-book device earth hour edison chen 陳冠希 education egg of columbus eggette 雞蛋仔 eminem emperor 英皇 english epson etsy facebook family fashion female filial finance flensburger flight of the conchords food forever alone france fuuu gender germany gift gill gates global warming globalization gogol bordello google graphics grayson perry greenpeace guggenheim happiness hkcee hong kong 香港 howcanipick human humour idn illness imperfection inception ipad iphone japan kanye west killing kirin lanvin LG liberation life logo lord inglip love magazine magic trackpad mail art management manipulation money moral movie mozilla music news newspaper objectification olympus olympus pen EPL2 paraconceptual parknshop paypal peace philosophy planet earth plato form politics practical joke preconception product project pronunciation race readymade real estate recycle religion ruby news rumour sapporo science scmp self sex sharing shitbrix sight sleep sophie calle sotheby's source stella artois stephen hawking stephen king stradivarius sui jianguo 隋建國 suicide taifook securities 大福證券 ted television terence koh the body shop the diary the java 渣華道98號 the l word tiffany and co tobias wong toilet tracey emin truth tshirt twitter TWONTW universe useless conversation vegetarian violin waitrose wallpaper waste watsons water wife cake windows 95 wish y u no

Archive

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Copy Dolly


text and image originally posted at
howcanipick 2004

我又做左餉其他人眼中出乎意料既事,就係買陳冠希碟.雖然"Please Steal this Album"當中既概念應該有好多人知,不過都講下啦就係話得到作品個訊息就得唔理用咩途徑翻版或download都得.我幾同意呢個睇法.

d 歌星成日話要打擊翻版因為翻版打擊樂壇,其實只不過係打擊左佢地既收入,同本質品質無關係,質量差既話人地翻唔翻都唔會得到認同,質量好既話,翻版上印既仍然係原創作人既名(抄人橋當係自己既果d今次唔講),餉本質上根本無打擊.當然翻版既質素可能比較低,不過只要接觸既知道係翻既同明白就無問題,通街都係Nike翻,有邊個唔知Nike係好野?時裝或某d界都話變樣得離譜d,就咁加個牌子就扮係,可能真係將其本質扭曲得好緊要,如果d人真係蠢到信係真就真係影響創作者聲譽,不過歌影呢一類,就咁複製應該同原本差唔多,唔通搵個人扮咩所以餉訊息傳遞方面應該效果差唔多.

其實古時無所謂版權,音樂家既音樂藝術家既畫咪又係俾人傳到世界各地我地都無問過佢地架(都死左咯).不過我地將佢地既傑作發表,佢地應該唔介意掛.係唔係宜家d人唔同左,點解我地影印下任何野都唔得?當然餉法律上收支平衡上有限制無可否認.

複製Dolly媽果陣都無問佢wor,係唔係要個身寫住"copyright"人先會話對佢尊重重要?

No comments:

Post a Comment